Theory of Everything

May 8th, 2011 by Dickey Eason

I just read Seth Godin’s book Tribes. He says that we need leaders who will step outside the lines–who will be bold and “say what they see”.  But he also says that it takes time to build a tribe of people who believe and support what you have to say. Of course, Seth Godin is talking to IMPACTS though he doesn’t know it. See nobody knows about the IMPACTS except for a very few. That is my challenge–to spread the word.

The IMPACTS dynamic (theory and concept) describes what is happening in the universe. It doesn’t describe every interaction–it explains the template upon which everything is based–and of course that includes human activities such as business. See everything is following the exact same model so all we have to do is keep filling in the blanks.

Some will say this is preposterous–that no one can figure this out. Today’s human beings have been conditioned to think that such discoveries are impossible but that doesn’t appear to have been the case before agriculture and the development of a nucleus in society, a nucleus that took control of the IMPACTS and their energy.  Somehow, pre-agricultural communities could move stones of huge tonnage up steep mountains and deposit them on top of each other so precisely that even today a razor blade cannot be slipped between the rocks. We couldn’t do that with a plethora of cranes or helicopters.

We need to be un-conditioned and start looking at the real possibilities that are all around us–and they are stupendous.

Incorrect Paradigm

April 20th, 2011 by Dickey Eason

Try to imagine what it was like to be a “scientist” during the Middle Ages when the Church decreed that the earth was the center of the universe. Pretty tough sledding! The paradigm was not conducive to new ideas–it was conducive to serving the Church.

Is today any different? Yes, the paradigm has been changed but how much? Is there a new Church in charge, and I don’t mean one based on conventional religion?

I think there is, and I call it the SN for structural-nucleus. It is essentially the same paradigm except now the SN is in charge and slyly decrees how the world works. It promotes innovation–that enhances it. It doesn’t promote innovation that threatens it. It wants new ideas for products and services but not new ideas about sharing control and power.  It sees itself as the driver of the machine.

This sounds like a big conspiracy but I think it is just a clash of the 2 major forces in the universe–the “pulling to itself” male force and the “creative-sharing-productive” female force.

If we don’t have an accurate paradigm, then we are working against the true template of the universe. If we get in sync with the true template, things become much clearer.

Capitalism and Socialism

April 17th, 2011 by Dickey Eason

We all know that capitalists are usually more ME-oriented and socialists more OTHER-oriented. I have been discussing how the circular usually becomes the fuel. The electron becomes the fuel for the atom as it bonds with other electrons, producing molecules. DNA in a prokaryotic cell (without a clearly defined nucleus) is basically in a circular configuration. DNA in a eukaryotic cell (with a nucleus) is in a linear configuration. The nucleus uses the old prokaryotic bacteria (now mitochondria) as its energy source.

The San tribe and its shamans lived without a clearly defined nucleus. It was a circular configuration. The huts were circular–they were arranged in a circle–life was circular. With the development of agriculture, the “circular” people were captured and became the fuel for the hierarchal SN (structural-nucleus) that developed. The circle became the fuel for the linear.

It is the same today. You generally find the circular IMPACTS away from the SN–away from the nucleus. Thinking tends to be linear near the nucleus and more “circular” away from it. Capitalism depends on the IMPACTS for its fuel–and the IMPACTS more often than not have a more OTHER-directed mentality. The OTHER-directed mentality is the birthplace of most new ideas. The capitalists then grab these ideas and the people who spawned them and use them as fuel–capitalists to a very large degree depend on socialists for their fuel.

Every model that I have seen is the same across the universe–a dense core pulling to itself and a “lighter” energy on the periphery trying to get away and bond with other “lighter” energy.  When it does, it becomes fuel–fuel that a male energy wants and needs in order to survive.

A New Economy

March 31st, 2011 by Dickey Eason

I have said on many occasions that the IMPACTS are the fuel for the human race. That means in science, art and culture, medicine, and everything else–including most of all, the economy.  The IMPACTS don’t even know who they are much less that they are the drivers of the economy–around the world.

I think the IMPACTS need to start a new economy, or maybe I should say reorient the current one in a new direction. What does that mean?  It means IMPACTS learning about who they are, how the world operates, how to identify other IMPACTS, and then purchasing products and services from the “right” IMPACTS–the ones with ideals and behavior that promote a better world.

That is the way to change the world.

Questions for You

March 25th, 2011 by Dickey Eason

Are you ready to end the illusion?

Have you had enough of the injustices, endless wars, and countless inequities?

Are you tired of the endless excuses for why we have the world we do?

Do you want to know why the same things keep happening time and time again?

Are you tired of feeling like you have no voice in this world?

Do you want to know how it can all be changed?

More later on what we can do to get started.

End the illusion?

March 21st, 2011 by Dickey Eason

Are you ready to end the illusion and discover the truth about how the world and universe actually work? Are you ready to learn about the simple model on which everything in the universe is based, and that includes your business or your favorite charity, and your country and government–even your family?

You may not be and that is very understandable.  After all, you work your whole life with a model that you take for granted and then someone–not even an “official” scientist–tells you it is all wrong. Why would you listen?

Usually the only reason you would listen is because things are so bad for you that you have to listen–or because you are the eternally open and inquisitive person–and there aren’t many of those.

So take your time, but when you are ready, the IMPACTS information will be available to you right here on this website.

Soon, I will be making a LONG video (almost a documentary) that will explain everything.

The Financial Disaster of 2008

March 20th, 2011 by Dickey Eason

I watched Inside Job last night about the financial meltdown of 2008-2009.  Amazing it has been out 6 months and has grossed only $4 million. Of course, the usual distributors are not interested in distributing this film.

I have said on many occasions that the IMPACTS are the fuel for everything in which humans engage–everything.  How does this translate to the financial collapse?

IMPACTS are rarely in banking. They are usually creating and/or producing something REAL–not “derivatives” and other such nonsense.  The financial services industry “feeds” on the creative-productivity of the rest of the economy, especially the IMPACTS who are at the foundation of all of it. But the IMPACTS are not in the financial services industry to provide checks and balances on it as they are in most companies and industries.

As I have mentioned, if the IMPACTS are not “there” , then the fuel is not there, and therefore the entity will not survive.  It will collapse just as the financial sector collapsed. Rome collapsed probably for the same reasons–the SN got stretched way beyond its capacity. That means that the IMPACTS did not have the influence needed to keep everything “together” and in order. The SN just wants to get Bigger and Stronger - the financial industry is the perfect example of that attitude.

Countries decline because the IMPACTS continually get pushed aside by the BIG SN boys who are just interested in their own egos and riches. This is the world we have where IMPACTS are used only as fuel by the SN machine. It is essential that IMPACTS learn who they are and the power they have to change things–and then bond together and take action to balance the 2 major forces–the SN and the IMPACTS. That is the only way to change the world short of a disastrous calamity.

It is Not Either/Or–It is God and Goddess

March 13th, 2011 by Dickey Eason

Why would we think that the supreme power is God OR Goddess? Why couldn’t the universe have both?

I think it does. I think the IMPACTS force is the Goddess–I think that the SN force is the male God.

But they are almost opposites–the Goddess is love and creation, God is power and control.

The SN force is in control of society so it makes sense that we would get its version of reality. The Goddess, or IMPACTS force, is used as the fuel for the SN machine.

This new view makes perfect sense when you learn some of the basics of the IMPACTS concept. Currently, the SN is dictating to us how everything works. It is time to look at the world and universe from the other side–the IMPACTS or Goddess side.

Big Bang and Now

March 7th, 2011 by Dickey Eason

People like to think that they can understand how everything works without knowing anything about science. Of course that is not true. You have to have a basic understanding of physics and chemistry. I said BASIC—that is really all you need, in my opinion.


Most scientists adhere to a Big Bang theory where the universe “appeared” about 14 billion years ago. Actually it was a Big Expansion and not a Big Bang, theoretically. But it really doesn’t matter either way. What really matters I think is that the same forces that shaped events immediately after the Big Bang are still the same forces shaping events in today’s universe. It is especially clear on earth because of the presence of life—especially us (human beings).


Let’s look at the Big Bang and its immediate aftermath briefly. First, from Dr. Robert Piccioni, author and physicist:

The asymmetry of the weak force (technical term is CP-violation) that very slightly favors matter over antimatter is one of these knobs (without which we wouldn’t be here*). There is no known reason why the weak force acts this way. By 1 second after the Big Bang, there were 1,000,000,001 particles (matter*) for every 1,000,000,000 antiparticles (antimatter*). If that asymmetry had been slightly more, the universe would have long since collapsed to nothing, hence no life. If that asymmetry had been slightly less, the universe would have almost no matter in it and would have expanded so rapidly that a volume of space now occupied by an entire galaxy might instead contain only 1 atom, hence no life. No one knows why, but we are quite sure this is true.

* I added the word or phrase in parentheses for clarity.


So the asymmetrical weak force enabled practically all that exist right now.


Let’s look at the major variables, forces, and concepts present at the Big Bang.

- Exist versus not-exist – matter versus antimatter. This can be construed as a critical need.

- Opposites—matter (good) and antimatter (bad).

- Creative force versus status quo or what could be considered the controlling force or forces.

- Asymmetry of the weak force which appears to be the creative force.


The same major variables, forces, and concepts are in existence today as they relate to human beings and human society.

- The group I named the IMPACTS bring things into being. They are the creative force in human society.

- There is generally asymmetry or mental-emotive-behavioral “issues” within the IMPACTS genealogy. This was apparent in the San tribe and its shamans over 100,000 years ago.

- There are opposites within human society—the IMPACTS and the SN. The SN is the controlling force, the status quo force—the IMPACTS are the creative force. The controlling force, the SN, uses the creative force, the IMPACTS, as fuel.

- Within nature there is the same—the structure of the carbon atom enables creation of life because of the valence electron energy level. Carbon has 4 electrons in that outer energy level and needs 4 more for balance. It gets these by forming bonds with other carbon atoms and hydrogen as the principal foundation but bonding with other atoms as well. The structure of the oxygen atom causes it to “burn” right through these organic carbon molecules, trying to balance its outer valence electron energy level by grabbing 2 electrons from the carbon molecules. In essence what is happening is oxygen is using carbon molecules as fuel. All atoms want to have the right number of electrons in the outer level.


So the same model that existed during the first few seconds after the Big Bang is still in existence today on earth, and we can assume throughout the universe.


How did I discover this? I discovered the IMPACTS group first—then other discoveries followed. I think it is essential to understand who the IMPACTS are and the roles they play in human society—then the rest becomes much clearer. The IMPACTS perform the same role in human society as did the weak force just after the Big Bang and the carbon atom does in enabling life: the IMPACTS bring into being—they enable creation—they form powerful bonds. But then “oxygen” or the SN takes over and uses the IMPACTS and their creations as fuel.

Missing Mistakes

March 6th, 2011 by Dickey Eason

There was an article today in the NY Times about glaring mistakes and why people don’t see them. The author is Joseph Hallinan.

“It has been more than three years since the beginning of the Wall Street financial crisis, yet we continue to hear about new evidence of glaring errors and widespread misdoings. Even the smartest minds in finance are left scratching their heads: how did we not catch any of this sooner?

“When I hear this refrain, I am reminded of Boris Goldovsky.

“Goldovsky, who died in 2001, was a legend in opera circles, best remembered for his commentary during the Saturday matinee radio broadcasts of the Metropolitan Opera. But he was also a piano teacher. And it is as a teacher that he made a lasting — albeit unintentional — contribution to our understanding of why seemingly obvious errors go undetected for so long.

“One day, a student of his was practicing a piece by Brahms when Goldovsky heard something wrong. He stopped her and told her to fix her mistake. The student looked confused; she said she had played the notes as they were written. Goldovsky looked at the music and, to his surprise, the girl had indeed played the printed notes correctly — but there was an apparent misprint in the music.

“At first, the student and the teacher thought this misprint was confined to their edition of the sheet music alone. But further checking revealed that all other editions contained the same incorrect note. Why, wondered Goldovsky, had no one — the composer, the publisher, the proofreader, scores of accomplished pianists — noticed the error? How could so many experts have missed something that was so obvious to a novice?

“This paradox intrigued Goldovsky. So over the years he gave the piece to a number of musicians who were skilled sight readers of music — which is to say they had the ability to play from a printed score for the first time without practicing. He told them there was a misprint somewhere in the score, and asked them to find it. He allowed them to play the piece as many times as they liked and in any way that they liked. But not one musician ever found the error. Only when Goldovsky told his subjects which bar, or measure, the mistake was in did most of them spot it.

“Goldovsky’s experiment yielded a key insight into human error: not only had the experts misread the music — they had misread it in the same way. In a subsequent study, Goldovsky’s nephew, Thomas Wolf, discovered that good sight readers report that they do not read music note by note; instead, they rely on their recognition of familiar patterns and on their ability to organize the music into those patterns and dependable cues.

“In short, they don’t read; they infer. Moreover, this trait is not unique to musicians: pattern recognition is a hallmark of expertise in any number of fields; it is what allows experts to do quickly what amateurs do slowly.

“Goldovsky’s insight offers a useful metaphor for understanding the crisis on Wall Street: Not only did hedge-fund managers, bankers and others misread the danger involved in many of their investments, but they misread them in the same way.

“As Paul E. Kanjorski, a former congressman who served on the House Financial Services Committee, put it, ‘Why does it appear to the general public that all the finest minds in finance missed the most obvious?’

“It appears that way because they did miss it. These types of errors are most likely to be discovered by those who, like Goldovsky’s young student, look at the world with new, unblinking eyes.”

It is the same with the IMPACTS concept. Everyone has seemingly missed the group I call the IMPACTS, and therefore they have missed all the discoveries that come with it—in science, anthropology, history, business, art and culture, politics, and just about everything else. Get acquainted with the IMPACTS theory and see a different world—one with fewer mistakes.